- The Premier League gives guidance on its failures on its official website
- Fans, however, noticed an error on the page that details problems related to high challenges.
- Listen now: Everything is starting! Rubén Amorim's comments are notable … but can we blame him?
All fans said the same in the middle of an error of the Premier League around the new guide on high tacle.
The rules of the game continue to develop in the highest category, with some differences with respect to the European competition, such as the rules on handball and penalties compared to the Champions League.
The rules are detailed on the Premier League website, and the division also offers additional guidance on some possibly subjective decisions.
However, some followers overlooking eagle noticed a debatable error on the site when it comes to “additional orientation” about the feet challenges.
The information explains the different levels of high -level challenges, the applied sanctions and what is equivalent to each level.
But it has been pointed out that the image used in the upper part of the site to detail a fault with the high foot was not considered a fault in a real game.
All Premier League fans say the same about an image used on the official website
The entrance of Jeremy Doku to Alex Mac Allister last year (which is not considered missing) is used as an example of a high foot.
Liverpool was denied a late penalty in the 1-1 draw with Manchester City last year.
The incident in question surrounds Jeremy Doku and Alexis Mac Allister at the end of last season, when Manchester City and Liverpool tied 1-1 in the Premier League in Anfield.
John Stones had given the city advantage in the first half, before Mac Allister scored a penalty. A draw was how it ended, but there was a controversial moment at the end.
Mac Allister ran to a late ball to the penalty area and fell to the ground after Doku's contract. The repetitions showed that it apparently received a kick in the chest, but no lack or penalty was sanctioned.
Subsequently, the key party incident panel ruled that the decision was correct. The Premier League, however, has used the incident as an example of a high foot on its website.
“An absolute disaster,” a fan published, previously Twitter, when they noticed the error.
Another wrote: “Can the Premier League confirm now that it should have been a foul, a penalty, a red card in addition to the Red and VAR were wrong?”
A third added, apparently with sarcasm: “Only a meeting in the penalty area in the last minutes of the game in a decisive match in the race for the title.”
The City would win the league with two points of advantage over Arsenal, while ending nine points ahead of the Liverpool of Jurgen Klopp.
Fans resorted to social networks to criticize the use of the image in the back that no fault was committed.
Additional orientation is provided on decisions behind high -level calls in the highest English category.
In terms of the guide on the page, there are three different levels of consideration: negligence, imprudence and excessive strength.
Carelessness is defined as having little strength, low speed and low degree of danger, among other things, and only justifies a free kick. Reckless is similar, but it has limited or partial contact, low or medium force and a high degree of control. The qualifying challenges are on a yellow card.
Finally, excessive force is equivalent to a red card and has total contact, great strength and high speed.
It is also defined as having a high contact point, a clear line of vision towards the opponent, completely widespread front leg and a high degree of danger.