It would be very easy to look at Saturday's defeat against Australia and say: there we go again. Yes, it was another loss for England, but it will hurt more because it performed a pretty good performance, not a bad,
There have been many poor exhibitions on a day of Cricket, since four defeats of the consecutive bilateral series and its profit ratio falling to 29 percent since it means the last World Cup.
Here, they did many things well: the construction of associations, someone going to have great hundreds, making sure that their best spin players in Centurion Ben Duckett and Joe Root were in the fold of those media, the new ball of Mark Wood and Jofra Archer.
But when you play in Australia, even Australia without five very key players, you must light per 100 overs and in periods that England did not, or did not finish the work.
It was fun, but even with 351 on the board I wasn't sure in which dressing room I would prefer to be in the intermediate stage.
In the old days, that would have been, but he felt that England was 30 short races. With such a solid base, the ancient team of England by Eoin Morgan would have obtained 400, while it lacked the required finish of Harry Brook, Jos Buttler and Liam Livingstone, and could only put a new total of the Champions Trophy because Archer Got Get Hold of the last time of Marnus Labuschagne.
Ben Duckett reached the highest score in England in a global tournament, but in a loser cause
England is missing the batting and bowling of the iconic all -terrain Ben Stokes on the side of a day
The poor form of an England's day is indicated by its winning relationship that falls to 29 percent from the last World Cup
There was the dew factor with which to deal with. At the launch, Steve Smith said that Australia had been training under the lights, that Rocío falls and that he went down. It is an advantage of hitting in second place, do not make mistakes.
However, beyond that, England has a problem with the balance on his side: as we saw in India, if they play with the extra bowling player, Jamie Overton ends in No 7, or potentially Gus Atkinson. Consider that Glenn Maxwell arrives at seven for the Australians.
Playing the extra batter, then you feel that England is a short bowling player. Not only that, but, behind the banker, Adil Rashid, there are three sailors, all of whom have recently brought a concern in the case of Brydon Cars or have long -term worries in Wood and Archer.
It turns out that you find yourself in games a little crossed fingers that the seam trio crosses 10 overs and can make a show, otherwise you are a bit stuffed.
If one of them has a bad day, as he did this weekend, things are more difficult to drive for a captain.
That was a slight difference between the two sides for me, because Smith achieved those exaggerated and complemented to drag his side to things, giving Maxwell some overs here, Labuschagne some here, keeping England seven and more. .
Ben Stokes's ship has sailed, but the defeat of five wickt at the Gaddafi stadium showed the value of a player like him good enough to play as a specialized hitter and bowl 10.
So, in the absence of Stokes, who could be? For my money, two boys who are not in the team of 15 men.
Brydon Crse did not have her best game in a shirt in England, than the most difficult crazy things for Jos Buttler
Although England did a series of things well in the draw, Josh Inglis directed Australia to victory
Sam Curran could hit among the first seven and strengthen the lower order for England
Liam Dawson could also provide another turn option and strengthen the average order
Sam Curran could hit the top seven and be a very useful bowling player in the mold that Nathan Ellis was for Australians, bowling and variations.
Or I could go with the left arm and the medium order baton of Liam Dawson. Both are excellent Cricket players, but they do not seem interested in any of them at this time and, therefore, they have had to follow the balance they chose for the first accessory of Group B.
It is also the XI that would choose Wednesday to face Afghanistan, opponents who have a perceived weakness against rhythm.
One thing that would say, however, is that, although the front wood and the goalkeeper were excellent, I felt that, as in India, recently, they exaggerated the short ball.
Josh Inglis is a good player of short things and were still running, hitting him halfway. There were many cuts and shots in persecution. There must be a little more of subtlety.
I thought that Australia really launched directly to the root, without letting him escape, particularly his unrecognized hero: without WICKETS, but 10 overs for 51, using all kinds of variations, it was an effort in that launch.
Then there was a difference in the two field on the side. In 100 overs, key moments are needed, that's why Cricket is a great game.
You can do it by 90-95 overs, but small incidents influence everything: Alex Carey takes two magnificent catches; If salt leave for another 10 overs, England gets 380; Jofra Archer drops Carey in 49; Next, Bang, Bang, four, four and the game is gone.
The frustration of his inaugural match of this tournament is not that they were miles away, but very close to doing well.